Journal: Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.z.)

Article Title: Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Performance Requirements of Horizontal Deceleration: A Review with Implications for Random Intermittent Multi-Directional Sports

doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01693-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of biomechanical demands of horizontal deceleration and performance implications

Article Snippet: Nedergaard et al. [ ] , 10 male soccer players , 135° COD using dominant leg to turn (Qualisys 3D motion cameras, 500 Hz; Norxon accelerometer, 500 Hz) , Mean approach velocity (m·s −1 ) = 4.8 (~ 90% maximum) Mean peak trunk deceleration (g): APFC = 4.37, PFC = 4.58, FFC = 4.10 Mean GCT (ms): APFC = 193, PFC = 273, FFC = 471 Mean peak ankle joint angular velocity (°/s): PFC = 367, FFC = 255 Mean peak knee joint angular velocity (°/s): PFC = 493, FFC = 377 , Preparatory braking steps prior to COD impose increased trunk deceleration and higher peak deceleration values than FFC step Reduced GCT during preparatory braking steps has significant effect on increasing peak trunk DEC Preparatory braking steps have increased ankle and knee joint angular velocities, representing increased loading severity and sensitivity to fatigue.

Techniques: Activation Assay, Shear, Control, Plasmid Preparation, Generated, Activity Assay, Muscles

Journal: Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.z.)

Article Title: Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Performance Requirements of Horizontal Deceleration: A Review with Implications for Random Intermittent Multi-Directional Sports

doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01693-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of studies investigating biomechanical determinants of horizontal deceleration ability

Article Snippet: Nedergaard et al. [ ] , 10 male soccer players , 135° COD using dominant leg to turn (Qualisys 3D motion cameras, 500 Hz; Norxon accelerometer, 500 Hz) , Mean approach velocity (m·s −1 ) = 4.8 (~ 90% maximum) Mean peak trunk deceleration (g): APFC = 4.37, PFC = 4.58, FFC = 4.10 Mean GCT (ms): APFC = 193, PFC = 273, FFC = 471 Mean peak ankle joint angular velocity (°/s): PFC = 367, FFC = 255 Mean peak knee joint angular velocity (°/s): PFC = 493, FFC = 377 , Preparatory braking steps prior to COD impose increased trunk deceleration and higher peak deceleration values than FFC step Reduced GCT during preparatory braking steps has significant effect on increasing peak trunk DEC Preparatory braking steps have increased ankle and knee joint angular velocities, representing increased loading severity and sensitivity to fatigue.

Techniques: Control

Journal: Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.z.)

Article Title: Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Performance Requirements of Horizontal Deceleration: A Review with Implications for Random Intermittent Multi-Directional Sports

doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01693-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of studies investigating neuromuscular performance determinants of horizontal deceleration ability

Article Snippet: Nedergaard et al. [ ] , 10 male soccer players , 135° COD using dominant leg to turn (Qualisys 3D motion cameras, 500 Hz; Norxon accelerometer, 500 Hz) , Mean approach velocity (m·s −1 ) = 4.8 (~ 90% maximum) Mean peak trunk deceleration (g): APFC = 4.37, PFC = 4.58, FFC = 4.10 Mean GCT (ms): APFC = 193, PFC = 273, FFC = 471 Mean peak ankle joint angular velocity (°/s): PFC = 367, FFC = 255 Mean peak knee joint angular velocity (°/s): PFC = 493, FFC = 377 , Preparatory braking steps prior to COD impose increased trunk deceleration and higher peak deceleration values than FFC step Reduced GCT during preparatory braking steps has significant effect on increasing peak trunk DEC Preparatory braking steps have increased ankle and knee joint angular velocities, representing increased loading severity and sensitivity to fatigue.

Techniques: Control